Skip to main content

Cool Regex Testers !!!

Anytime I have to play with regular expressions, I use one of the online regex testing web sites to come up with the regex I need. Last couple of times I had to come up with a regex for most common everyday stuff like dates and such. Oh yeah, last time it was date actually. I had a server response that had a date in the format yyyy-mm-dd, ISO format. I was working with JavaScript, and initially I was naive to use the Date class to parse the date in the response. Turned that there is difference in the way the date is interpreted by Firefox and other browsers.

Ok, this is not a rant post about the Date class but actually share some sites that help you with regular expressions, of course at different levels. Here is a list of such sites:


In the above list, I like the last but not the least - freeformatter.com. The cool thing about freeformatter is that it lists a lot of commonly used patterns such as emails, ip address etc. And I was lucky to find the ISO date pattern too, which saved me time. The uncool thing about it though, unlike other sites, is not haptic to the regex or input you type; instead requires an old-style submit button click to validate your expressions, and also does not show the matches (or capture groups).

Thought it will help anyone playing a lot with regular expressions!

PS: The actual issue with Date was not directly with the parsing but later on when the getDate, getDay, getMonth methods are used. While other browsers took the browser's time zone into account, Firefox did not. I was too bored to proceed with Date, and resorted to regex to parse out the date parts from my response. Here is the snippet of the code I used:

function formatDate(yyyymmdd) {
  var matches = yyyymmdd.match(/^(ISO DATE REGEX PATTERN)$/);

  if (matches == null) { return yyyymmdd; }

  var yyyy = matches[1];
  var mm = matches[2];
  var dd = matches[3];

  var date = new Date(yyyy, mm - 1, dd);

  return DAYS[date.getDay()].substring(0, 3)
   + ", "
   + MONTHS[date.getMonth()].substring(0, 3)
   + " " + date.getDate()
   + ", " + date.getFullYear();
}
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Extension Methods - A Polished C++ Feature !!!

Extension Method is an excellent feature in C# 3.0. It is a mechanism by which new methods can be exposed from an existing type (interface or class) without directly adding the method to the type. Why do we need extension methods anyway ? Ok, that is the big story of lamba and LINQ. But from a conceptual standpoint, the extension methods establish a mechanism to extend the public interface of a type. The compiler is smart enough to make the method a part of the public interface of the type. Yeah, that is what it does, and the intellisense is very cool in making us believe that. It is cleaner and easier (for the library developers and for us programmers even) to add extra functionality (methods) not provided in the type. That is the intent. And we know that was exercised extravagantly in LINQ. The IEnumerable was extended with a whole lot set of methods to aid the LINQ design. Remember the Where, Select etc methods on IEnumerable. An example code snippet is worth a thousand
7 comments
Read more

Implementing COM OutOfProc Servers in C# .NET !!!

Had to implement our COM OOP Server project in .NET, and I found this solution from the internet after a great deal of search, but unfortunately the whole idea was ruled out, and we wrapped it as a .NET assembly. This is worth knowing. Step 1: Implement IClassFactory in a class in .NET. Use the following definition for IClassFactory. namespace COM { static class Guids { public const string IClassFactory = "00000001-0000-0000-C000-000000000046"; public const string IUnknown = "00000000-0000-0000-C000-000000000046"; } /// /// IClassFactory declaration /// [ComImport(), InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIUnknown), Guid(COM.Guids.IClassFactory)] internal interface IClassFactory { [PreserveSig] int CreateInstance(IntPtr pUnkOuter, ref Guid riid, out IntPtr ppvObject); [PreserveSig] int LockServer(bool fLock); } } Step 2: [DllImport("ole32.dll")] private static extern int CoR
3 comments
Read more

sizeof vs Marshal.SizeOf !!!

There are two facilities in C# to determine the size of a type - sizeof operator and Marshal.SizeOf method. Let me discuss what they offer and how they differ. Pardon me if I happen to ramble a bit. Before we settle the difference between sizeof and Marshal.SizeOf , let us discuss why would we want to compute the size of a variable or type. Other than academic, one typical reason to know the size of a type (in a production code) would be allocate memory for an array of items; typically done while using malloc . Unlike in C++ (or unmanaged world), computing the size of a type definitely has no such use in C# (managed world). Within the managed application, size does not matter; since there are types provided by the CLR for creating\managing fixed size and variable size (typed) arrays. And as per MSDN, the size cannot be computed accurately. Does that mean we don't need to compute the size of a type at all when working in the CLR world? Obviously no, else I would
Post a Comment
Read more