Skip to main content

Implementing COM OutOfProc Servers in C# .NET !!!

Had to implement our COM OOP Server project in .NET, and I found this solution from the internet after a great deal of search, but unfortunately the whole idea was ruled out, and we wrapped it as a .NET assembly. This is worth knowing.

Step 1:

Implement IClassFactory in a class in .NET. Use the following definition for IClassFactory.

namespace COM
{
   static class Guids
   {
      public const string IClassFactory = "00000001-0000-0000-C000-000000000046";
      public const string IUnknown = "00000000-0000-0000-C000-000000000046";
   }
   
   /// 
   /// IClassFactory declaration
   /// 
   [ComImport(), InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIUnknown), Guid(COM.Guids.IClassFactory)]
   internal interface IClassFactory
   {
      [PreserveSig]
      int CreateInstance(IntPtr pUnkOuter, ref Guid riid, out IntPtr ppvObject);
      [PreserveSig]
      int LockServer(bool fLock);
   }
}

Step 2:

[DllImport("ole32.dll")]
private static extern int CoRegisterClassObject(ref Guid rclsid,
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Interface)]IClassFactory pUnkn,
int dwClsContext,
int flags,
out int lpdwRegister);

[DllImport("ole32.dll")]
private static extern int CoRevokeClassObject(int dwRegister);

Step 3:

Use these functions to register your own IClassFactory

Step 4:

IClassFactory has a CreateInstance method. Implement this method to return a reference (IntPtr) to your own object. Use Marshal.GetIUnknownForObject to get IUnknown pointer to your object.

Step 5:

The COM client receives a pointer to this object, and can use it as a regular COM object. .NET does the reference counting for you, and the GC will collect these objects when the COM-reference-count decremetns to zero.

Walking through and closely examining the working of ClassFactories for COM will give a clear sight of the objects that you need to implement in .NET, and a solution for COM Server in managed world.

3 comments

Popular posts from this blog

out, ref and InvokeMember !!!

When I was working on the .NET reflection extravaganza thing that I explained in my previous column, i learnt one another interesting thing, that is about the Type.InvokeMember. How will pass out or ref parameters for the method invoked using Type.InvokeMember ? If you are going to invoke a method with the prototypeint DoSomething(string someString, int someInt);then you would use InvokeMember like this:-object obj = someType.InvokeMember("DoSomething",
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance,
null,
this,
new object[] {"Largest Integer", 1});or use some variables in the new object[] {...}. But what do you with the args if DoSomething takes out or ref parameters ?int DoSomething(out string someString, ref int someInt);Something like this will not work string someText = string.Empty;
int someInt = 0;
object obj = someType.InvokeMember("DoSomething",
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic …

Passing CComPtr By Value !!!

This is about a killer bug identified by our chief software engineer in our software. What was devised for ease of use and write smart code ended up in this killer defect due to improper perception. Ok, let us go!CComPtr is a template class in ATL designed to wrap the discrete functionality of COM object management - AddRef and Release. Technically it is a smart pointer for a COM object.void SomeMethod() { CComPtr siPtr; HRESULT hr = siPtr.CoCreateInstance(CLSID_SomeComponent); siPtr->MethodOne(20, L"Hello"); }Without CComPtr, the code wouldn't be as elegant as above. The code would be spilled with AddRef and Release. Besides, writing code to Release after use under any circumstance is either hard or ugly. CComPtr automatically takes care of releasing in its destructor just like std::auto_ptr. As a C++ programmer, we must be able to appreciate the inevitability of the destructor and its immense use in writing smart code. However there is a difference between …

jqGrid: Handling array data !!!

This post is primarily a personal reference. I also consider this a tribute to Oleg, who was fundamental in improving my understanding of the jqGrid internals - the way it handles source data types, which if I may say led him in discovering a bug in jqGrid.

If you are working with local array data as the source for jqGrid, meaning you will get the data from the server but want the jqGrid not to talk to the server anymore, and want to have custom handling of the edit functionality/form and delete functionality, it is not going to be straightforward - you need to have a decent understanding of how jqGrid works, and you should be aware of the bug Oleg pointed in our discussion. I repeat this is all about using jqGrid to manage array data locally, no posting to server when you edit or delete, which is where the bug is.

$('#grid').jqGrid('navGrid', '#pager', { recreateForm: true, add: false, search: false, refresh: false, …